Archives

Next Archive

18 Apr - 24 Apr 2005
25 Apr - 01 May 2005
02 May - 08 May 2005
09 May - 15 May 2005
16 May - 22 May 2005
23 May - 29 May 2005
13 June - 19 June 2005
27 June - 03 Jul 2005
04 Jul - 10 Jul 2005
25 Jul - 31 Jul 2005
29 Aug - 04 Sep 2005
19 Sep - 25 Sep 2005
31 Oct - 06 Nov 2005
19 Dec - 25 Dec 2005
26 Dec - 01 Jan 2005
16 Jan - 22 Jan 2006
30 Jan - 05 Feb 2006
06 Feb - 12 Feb 2006
20 Feb - 26 Feb 2006
27 Feb - 05 Mar 2006
20 Mar - 26 Mar 2006
03 Apr - 09 Apr 2006
10 Apr - 16 Apr 2006
17 Apr - 23 Apr 2006

Calendar

Last Comments

Jool (What it Was:): this design is so cool great job
Stephen (What it Was:): I will be back often Congratulation and my best wis…
T. DArrigo (Reed Altemus Blog…): Cool Reed. I can relate to the copier art (and act…
Allan (A Bit About Marce…): Fluxus did not die. Fluxus lives.
Aideen (A Bit About Marce…): Did Fluxus Die?
Pierre-joseph Pro… ("Cop Shop" Fluxus…): I stand corrected. I stand. There is an author. [I]…
Pierre-joseph Pro… ("Cop Shop" Fluxus…): A simulation. True. NO egoist.
Michael Beyer (A Bit About Marce…): Paper on Duchamp: www.mmbe yer.comPapersArt _Histo…
Ruud Janssen (Ruud Janssen, Mai…): soon residing in Breda though...... Ru ud Janssen…
paolo rossi (The Fluxus Artist…): Ciao! a nice merge of technology and art This se…

Links

Digital Salon Main Page
Digital Salon Fluxus Page
Forty Years of Fluxus
Fluxlist
Fluxlist Blog
IUOMA
Walter Ciancusi
flobberlob
miulew - Björn Eriksson
Bowman's Ramblings
Roger Stevens
Don Boyd
Free Form Freakout
Fluxus Heidelberg
A1 Mail Art
Curious Things
Haven't-Garde Art
Fluxlist Archives
The Fluxus Museum
The Fluxus Portal
Ray Johnson
Fluxus Debris @ Art / not Art
Google
Pivot Blogging Software

Stuff

Powered byPivot - 1.24.1: 'Arcee'
XML Feed (RSS 1.0)
XML: Atom Feed

+ 0 - 0 | § For and Against Anti-Art

The following URLs link to various articles about anti-art. Some dispute the opinion that I offer in my previous posting.

Making art out of anti-art by Travis Hugh Culley

(a very well written article)

Anti-Art Is Not Art by Michelle Marder Kamhi

The "stuckist" argument against anti-art

(The "stuckists" are an interesting phenomenom of their own - a bit too proud of being stupid)

Dictionary definition from ArtLex

Create your own anti-art

+ 0 - 0 | § A Bit About Anti-Art

What is anti-art anyway? Can anti-art even exist? Isn't anti-art still art?

These are all good questions. Anti-art is obviously still art. It exists within the cultural context of the art world and it cannot exist without art. Before one is tempted to be smugly dismissive of the anti-art movement though, one needs to consider that just as anti-art exists within the world of art - art cannot exist within the broader context of culture without its own opposite - which is anti-art. So, anti-art must exist, even it it is a part of the art world. This is akin to the idea that post-modernism requires modernism to exist or there would be nothing for it to be "post".

OK, so in a nutshell, anti-art is still art but anti-art does exist. So what is anti-art anyway? I like to think of anti-art not so much as being "against" art, but as being more of an "antidote" to the dominant culture of art. Anti-art is art at the margins. It is art that exists independently of the dominant commerce driven art world. It exists even independently of the dominant so-called anti-art of the academic world (even if many artists involved with anti-art are a part of that world). Anti-art is art that exists and is created purely at the desire of the artist, for the edification of the creator. It does not depend on approval from anybody else. It doesn't even require the approval of other anti-artists. This does not mean that communities of like-minded creators cannot exist. Artists or anti-artists, or anti-art artists are still human - are still social beings. Why should they be excluded from broader communities?

+ 0 - 0 | § Allan Kaprow

From a biography of Allan Kaprow at World Wide Arts Resources:

Allan Kaprow is mostly known as the inventor of “happenings,” a concept of performance art. He studied under a variety of teachers including musician John Cage, who gave him the idea of chance in aesthetic organization. Initially a painter, Kaprow abandoned the medium for assemblage and environmental art in the 1950’s. In a 1958 article in Art News, he introduced his idea of happenings, stating that craftsmanship and permanence should be forgotten and perishable materials should be used in art.

Kaprow Links:
http://wwar.com/masters/k/kaprow-allan.html

http://www.boingboing.net/2006/04/07/allan_kaprow_1927200.html

http://www.the-artists.org/ArtistView.cfm?id=F767B358-0F32-4CA3-970E3FD5D29F85E4

http://www.ubu.com/historical/kaprow/kaprow.html