Archives

Next Archive Previous Archive

18 Apr - 24 Apr 2005
25 Apr - 01 May 2005
02 May - 08 May 2005
09 May - 15 May 2005
16 May - 22 May 2005
23 May - 29 May 2005
13 June - 19 June 2005
27 June - 03 Jul 2005
04 Jul - 10 Jul 2005
25 Jul - 31 Jul 2005
29 Aug - 04 Sep 2005
19 Sep - 25 Sep 2005
31 Oct - 06 Nov 2005
19 Dec - 25 Dec 2005
26 Dec - 01 Jan 2005
16 Jan - 22 Jan 2006
30 Jan - 05 Feb 2006
06 Feb - 12 Feb 2006
20 Feb - 26 Feb 2006
27 Feb - 05 Mar 2006
20 Mar - 26 Mar 2006
03 Apr - 09 Apr 2006
10 Apr - 16 Apr 2006
17 Apr - 23 Apr 2006

Calendar

Last Comments

Jool (What it Was:): this design is so cool great job
Stephen (What it Was:): I will be back often Congratulation and my best wis…
T. DArrigo (Reed Altemus Blog…): Cool Reed. I can relate to the copier art (and act…
Allan (A Bit About Marce…): Fluxus did not die. Fluxus lives.
Aideen (A Bit About Marce…): Did Fluxus Die?
Pierre-joseph Pro… ("Cop Shop" Fluxus…): I stand corrected. I stand. There is an author. [I]…
Pierre-joseph Pro… ("Cop Shop" Fluxus…): A simulation. True. NO egoist.
Michael Beyer (A Bit About Marce…): Paper on Duchamp: www.mmbe yer.comPapersArt _Histo…
Ruud Janssen (Ruud Janssen, Mai…): soon residing in Breda though...... Ru ud Janssen…
paolo rossi (The Fluxus Artist…): Ciao! a nice merge of technology and art This se…

Links

Digital Salon Main Page
Digital Salon Fluxus Page
Forty Years of Fluxus
Fluxlist
Fluxlist Blog
IUOMA
Walter Ciancusi
flobberlob
miulew - Björn Eriksson
Bowman's Ramblings
Roger Stevens
Don Boyd
Free Form Freakout
Fluxus Heidelberg
A1 Mail Art
Curious Things
Haven't-Garde Art
Fluxlist Archives
The Fluxus Museum
The Fluxus Portal
Ray Johnson
Fluxus Debris @ Art / not Art
Google
Pivot Blogging Software

Stuff

Powered byPivot - 1.24.1: 'Arcee'
XML Feed (RSS 1.0)
XML: Atom Feed

+ 4 - 1 | § The Fluxus Artist

I loved this bit from the book FLUXUS by Thomas Kellein:
After all, the Fluxus artist, in so far as one can compare the central figure of George Maciunas with Joseph Beuys or the mature Nam June Paik, was, to put it bluntly, an alarming social failure. In the turbulent change of the 60s, he tended to be overlooked. In the 70s, he failed to have any links with the more thought-provoking and process art. Before the art boom of the 80s had taken hold, he had died. But then again, there was in any case no volume of early drawings and objects which coul have been marketed profitably.
Um... maybe that was the point Tom.